Patterns of Fifth-Grade Students’ Difficulties in Solving Fraction Problems Across Mathematical Ability Levels

Rahmatia Rahmatia; Muh. Salsabil; La Eru Ugi; Azis Azis

doi:10.58230/josse.v3i2.830

Authors

Rahmatia Rahmatia Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
Muh. Salsabil Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
La Eru Ugi Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
Azis Azis Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58230/josse.v3i2.830

Keywords:

Fraction Difficulties, Mathematical Ability Levels, Fraction Problem Solving, Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge, Elementary Mathematics

Abstract

Fractions remain a challenging topic in elementary mathematics because successful problem solving requires students to coordinate problem comprehension, conceptual understanding, procedural knowledge, and mathematical representation. This study aimed to analyze the patterns of fifth-grade students’ difficulties in solving fraction problems across different mathematical ability levels. A descriptive qualitative design was employed involving 30 fifth-grade students at SD Negeri 8 Baubau, Indonesia. Data were collected through a 10-item open-ended fraction test administered to all participants and semi-structured interviews with three students representing high-, medium-, and low-ability levels. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, comparison of written responses and interview evidence, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that 20.00% of students were classified as high ability, 36.67% as medium ability, and 43.33% as low ability. Three major patterns of difficulty were identified: understanding fraction problems, performing fraction operations, and mathematical problem solving. High-ability students generally understood the problems and selected appropriate operations but still made minor procedural and accuracy-related errors. Medium-ability students demonstrated partial conceptual understanding accompanied by unstable procedural knowledge, particularly in converting fraction forms, finding common denominators, and selecting appropriate operations. Low-ability students showed the most complex pattern, involving interconnected difficulties in understanding problem situations, representing quantitative relationships, performing fraction operations, and organizing complete solution procedures. These findings indicate that fraction difficulties differ qualitatively across ability levels; therefore, instruction should be differentiated by emphasizing accuracy and verification for high-ability students, conceptual–procedural connections for medium-ability students, and integrated comprehension–representation–procedure scaffolding for low-ability students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agusfianuddin, A., Herman, T., & Turmudi, T. (2024). Investigation of students’ difficulties in mathematical language: Problem-solving in mathematical word problems at elementary schools. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i2.11257

Azis, A. (2019). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada pembelajaran matematika kelas VIII. Jurnal Akademik Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/7fpjz

Azis, A., Handayani, I. T., Ferniati, F., Anggriana, N., & Aisyah, A. (2023). Analysis of students’ cognitive difficulties based on the revised Bloom’s taxonomy in solving mathematics problems. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30762/factor_m.v6i1.1057

Azis, A., Iriana, A., & Sudin, L. (2022). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal pemecahan masalah matematika pada siswa kelas XI MIA SMA. Jurnal Akademik Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.55340/japm.v8i1.697

Azis, A., Nurlita, M., & Zulkifran, Z. (2022). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal operasi bilangan pecahan pada siswa SMP. Jurnal Akademik Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.55340/japm.v8i2.875

Balik, Y. R., Sulistyaningsih, M., & Manurung, O. (2023). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita SPLDV berdasarkan Polya. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keguruan, 1(1), 140–153.

Burr, S. M. D. L., Xu, C., Li, H., Si, J., Huang, B., & Guo, K. (2026). Finding their way: Students’ fraction misconceptions and errors over two years of fraction learning. Learning and Instruction, 106, Artikel 102454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102454

Fitri, Y., Turmuzi, M., Wahyuningsih, B. Y., & Alimuddin, N. (2026). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika materi pecahan kelas V SDN 2 Paokmotong tahun ajaran 2025/2026. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 7(3), 3589–3595.

Flores, M. M., Hinton, V. M., & Schweck, K. B. (2024). Teaching rational number concepts to fifth-grade students who struggle with mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 45(5), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231217315

Flores, M., Morano, S., Meyer, J., & Hinton, V. (2022). Teaching fraction magnitude to elementary students. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 27(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2021.2009346

Girgin, F., & Altay, M. K. (2024). Fifth grade students’ performance and common errors in equivalent fractions. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 13(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1328901

Hakqi, A. N., Nusantara, T., & Rufiana, I. S. (2025). Analisis pemahaman konsep pecahan siswa sekolah dasar menggunakan tes diagnostik three tier multiple choice. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(3), 2404–2410. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i3.1384

Hariyani, M., Herman, T., Suryadi, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2022). Exploration of student learning obstacles in solving fraction problems in elementary school. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(3), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.3.505

Husna, A., Bahri, S., & Aulia Safira, S. (2024). Analisis miskonsepsi operasi penjumlahan pecahan siswa SD kelas 5 Nisam Antara Aceh Utara. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 45–54.

Izzati, N., & Maula, M. (2025). Analysis of students’ mathematical problem-solving ability on fraction material. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v14i1.2681

Lenz, K., Reinhold, F., & Wittmann, G. (2024). Topic specificity of students’ conceptual and procedural fraction knowledge and its impact on errors. Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2022.2135132

Lin, X., & Powell, S. R. (2021). Examining the relation between whole numbers and fractions: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 67, Artikel 102017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102017

Lin, X., & Powell, S. R. (2023). Initial efficacy of a fraction-vocabulary intervention for students experiencing mathematics difficulty in grade 4. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 38(4), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12321

Magfirotin, E. S., & Amir, M. F. (2024). Elementary school students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge in solving fraction problems. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 15(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v15i1.48912

Mavrikis, M., Rummel, N., Wiedmann, M., Loibl, K., & Holmes, W. (2022). Combining exploratory learning with structured practice educational technologies to foster both conceptual and procedural fractions knowledge. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 881–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10104-0

Myers, J. A., Witzel, B. S., Powell, S. R., Li, H., Pigott, T. D., Xin, Y. P., & Hughes, E. M. (2022). A meta-analysis of mathematics word-problem solving interventions for elementary students who evidence mathematics difficulties. Review of Educational Research, 92(5), 695–736. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211070049

Pedersen, P. L., Aunio, P., Sunde, P. B., Bjerre, M., & Waagepetersen, R. (2023). Differences in high- and low-performing students’ fraction learning in the fourth grade. The Journal of Experimental Education, 91(4), 621–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2022.2107603

Powell, A. B. (2023). Enhancing students’ fraction magnitude knowledge: A study with students in early elementary education. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 70, Artikel 101042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101042

Rojo, M., King, S., Gersib, J., & Bryant, D. P. (2023). Rational number interventions for students with mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 44(3), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221105520

Rosmayasari, R., Suryadi, D., Herman, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2024). Problem-solving ability of fifth-graders in mathematical word problem. KnE Social Sciences, 9(8), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15321

Saleh, S. F., Sirajuddin, Ernawati, & Damayanti, N. (2023). Analysis of students’ mathematical ability in solving fraction problems at elementary school level. AULADUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 10(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.24252/auladuna.v10i1a9.2023

Spitzer, M. W. H., & Moeller, K. (2022). Predicting fraction and algebra achievements online: A large-scale longitudinal study using data from an online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1640–1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12721

Unaenah, E., & Suryadi, D. (2023). Students’ learning obstacles on fractions in elementary school. Dalam A. G. Abdullah et al. (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Education 2022 (ICE 2022) (hlm. 148–157). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-060-2_17

Vessonen, T., Dahlberg, M., Hellstrand, H., Widlund, A., Korhonen, J., Aunio, P., & Laine, A. (2024). Task characteristics associated with mathematical word problem-solving performance among elementary school-aged children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(4), Artikel 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09954-2

Wong, T. T. Y., & Yip, E. S. K. (2023). What is the unknown? The ability to identify the semantic role of the unknown from word problems longitudinally predicts mathematical problem solving performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, Artikel 102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102183

Zhang, S., Yu, S., Xiao, J., Liu, Y., & Jiang, T. (2022). The effects of Concrete-Representational-Abstract sequence instruction on fractions for Chinese elementary students with mathematics learning disabilities. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(7), 1435–1457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10215-9