Negotiating Professionalism in Montessori Schools: Organizational Culture and Professional Development Among Generation Z Employees

Authors

  • Rita Kurnia Universitas Riau
  • Daviq Chairilsyah Universitas Riau
  • Kartika Sari Universitas Riau
  • Erma Roza Universitas Riau
  • Rionar Rambe Universitas Riau
  • Riza Purnama Sari Universitas Riau
  • Musaroh Musaroh Universitas Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58230/josse.v3i2.737

Keywords:

Generation Z, Montessori Schools, Organizational Culture, Professional Development, Professionalism

Abstract

Educational organizations increasingly employ younger workers who are often classified as Generation Z, yet little is known about how such employees negotiate work values within value-based school cultures. In this study, Generation Z functions as a sampling context rather than an explanatory variable, and no intergenerational comparison is intended. This study examined how younger employees within this sampling context construct professionalism in two Montessori schools in Pekanbaru, Indonesia, and how educational-management practices shape their professional development. A qualitative multiple-case design involved 10 employees aged 22–29 years, comprising eight teachers and two administrative staff; the empirical analysis used participant interview excerpts, critical incidents, a 12-code analytical framework, within-case analysis, cross-case comparison, and negative/deviant case examination. Four themes were identified. Structured professional autonomy described agency as meaningful when paired with competence, clear boundaries, trust, and accountability. Internalization of Montessori purpose showed movement from institutional rules toward professional judgment oriented to educational purpose and children’s needs. Developmental feedback and mentoring supported prepared-adult formation when they promoted reflection, competence, and self-regulation, whereas excessive monitoring could reduce initiative. Negotiated accountability captured how employees balanced agency with consequences for children, colleagues, parents, and the organization. Cross-case analysis showed that School A emphasized role clarity, coordination, and procedural reliability, whereas School B emphasized trust, reflective mentoring, and professional judgment. Integratively, the findings support negotiated professionalism as a developmental process linking agency, organizational values, professional learning, and responsibility. Montessori schools should therefore stage autonomy and feedback according to demonstrated competence, role boundaries, and decision risk rather than presumed generational preference.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013

Barhate, B., & Dirani, K. M. (2022). Career aspirations of Generation Z: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1/2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2020-0124

Bennetts, K., & Bone, J. (2020). Montessori literature through the lens of leadership. Journal of Montessori Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v6i2.13537

Bhushan, B. (2023). Developing Generation Z employees: A two-stage mediation model. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 37(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-03-2022-0051

Bilderback, S., & Kilpatrick, M. (2026). Should we meet them where they are? Rethinking Gen Z professional development. Strategic HR Review, 25(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-09-2025-0099

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481

Chaudhry, S. (2024). Sustaining talent: A social exchange perspective on the Generation Z workforce. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 38(5), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-11-2023-0245

Chillakuri, B. (2020). Understanding Generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277–1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058

Chiu, T. K. F., Falloon, G., Song, Y., Wong, V. W. L., Zhao, L., & Ismailov, M. (2024). A self-determination theory approach to teacher digital competence development. Computers & Education, 214, 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105017

Coppe, T., Parmentier, M., Kelchtermans, G., Raemdonck, I., März, V., & Colognesi, S. (2024). Beyond traditional narratives about teacher professional development: A critical perspective on teachers’ working life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 139, 104436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104436

Damore, S., & Rieckhoff, B. (2021). Leading reflective practices in Montessori schools. Journal of Montessori Research, 7(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v7i1.14832

de Boer, P., & Bordoloi, P. (2022). Nationality differences in Gen Z work values: An exploratory study. Journal of International Education in Business, 15(2), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-09-2021-0088

Dugas, D. (2021). The Identity Triangle: Toward a unified framework for teacher identity. Teacher Development, 25(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2021.1874500

Gerker, H. E. (2023). Making sense of Montessori teacher identity, Montessori pedagogy, and educational policies in public schools. Journal of Montessori Research, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v9i1.18861

Goh, E., & Baum, T. (2021). Job perceptions of Generation Z hotel employees towards working in COVID-19 quarantine hotels: The role of meaningful work. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(5), 1688–1710. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2020-1295

Groenewald, E., & Arnold, L. (2024). Teacher professional identity: Agentic actions of a novice teacher in a challenging school context. Teachers and Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2308890

Huang, L., Zhang, T., & Huang, Y. (2020). Effects of school organizational conditions on teacher professional learning in China: The mediating role of teacher self-efficacy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100893

Lillard, A. S. (2019). Shunned and admired: Montessori, self-determination, and a case for radical school reform. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 939–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09483-3

Mahmoud, A. B., Fuxman, L., Mohr, I., Reisel, W. D., & Grigoriou, N. (2021). “We aren’t your reincarnation!” Workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0448

McChesney, K., & Cross, J. (2023). How school culture affects teachers’ classroom implementation of learning from professional development. Learning Environments Research, 26, 785–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09454-0

Melesse, T., & Belay, S. (2024). School climate and teacher professional capital: Mediating role of teacher professional identity. Education 3–13, 52(8), 1238–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2143723

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-data-analysis/book246128

Moss, J., & Wheeler, T. (2024). Beliefs about autonomy support and control in the classroom: An examination of Montessori and traditional U.S. public school teachers. Journal of Montessori Research, 10(2), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v10i2.20260

Murray, A. K., Daoust, C. J., & Mallett, J. (2021). Designing the Montessori Coaching Tool Elementary Rubric for early-career professional development. Journal of Montessori Research, 7(2), 25–61. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v7i2.15866

Nguyen, D., Pietsch, M., & Gümüş, S. (2021). Collective teacher innovativeness in 48 countries: Effects of teacher autonomy, collaborative culture, and professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103463

Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287

Pataki-Bittó, F., & Kapusy, K. (2021). Work environment transformation in the post COVID-19 based on work values of the future workforce. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 23(3), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-08-2020-0031

Rahman, A. (2022). Investigating school conditions for teachers’ professional learning and development in Indonesia. Teacher Development, 26(2), 240–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2034662

Rudolph, C. W., Rauvola, R. S., Costanza, D. P., & Zacher, H. (2021). Generations and generational differences: Debunking myths in organizational science and practice and paving new paths forward. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36, 945–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09715-2

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305

Sari, K., Rambe, R., Roza, E., Isjoni, M. Y. R., & Erlisnawati. (2026). Integrasi pedagogi Montessori dan nilai-nilai Islam di Alif Montessori School Pekanbaru: Studi tentang identitas, distingsi, dan inovasi pendidikan. Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian, 5(5), 3465–3483. https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v5i5.5845

Siswanto, I. L., & Kuswandono, P. (2020). Understanding teacher identity construction: Professional experiences of becoming Indonesian Montessori teachers. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i1.539

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Wibowo, D. (2022). The role of school culture in teacher professional development for peace education: The case of Sukma Bangsa School Pidie in post-conflict Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of Peace Education, 19(2), 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2021.2015573

Yadav, D. (2022). Criteria for good qualitative research: A comprehensive review. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31, 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0

Zhang, X., Admiraal, W., & Saab, N. (2022). Teacher autonomous motivation for continuous professional development: The relationship with perceived workplace conditions. Teachers and Teaching, 28(8), 909–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2022.2137128

Downloads

Published

2026-08-29

How to Cite

Kurnia, R., Chairilsyah, D., Sari, K., Roza, E., Rambe, R., Sari, R. P., & Musaroh, M. (2026). Negotiating Professionalism in Montessori Schools: Organizational Culture and Professional Development Among Generation Z Employees. Journal of Social and Scientific Education, 3(2), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.58230/josse.v3i2.737

Similar Articles

1-10 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.