Development and Evaluation of Interactive Video: An Instructional Material for Teaching Plumbing System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58230/josse.v2i3.352Keywords:
Interactive Video, Instructional Materials, Plumbing Systems, ADDIE Model, ICT ToolsAbstract
In the era of an ICT-driven educational landscape, engaging students in technical-vocational subjects remains a challenge, particularly in the plumbing trade, where there is a shortage of skilled practitioners and qualified trainers. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the acceptability of an interactive instructional video on the plumbing system to address both engagement and skill development needs. A developmental research method, guided by the ADDIE Model, was employed in designing videos, emphasizing content design, media design, visual design, assessment items, feedback mechanisms, and navigation. These features are intended to capture students’ interest, promote active engagement, and enhance appreciation of plumbing as both an academic subject and a viable trade. Purposive sampling was used to select 30 respondents: three (3) plumbing instructors, two (2) educational technology teachers, and twenty-five (25) third-year students majoring in Industrial Arts. The data were gathered using a modified survey questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed through descriptive statistics (frequency distribution, mean, standard deviation) and a Welch’s Independent T-test to compare teacher and student evaluations. Results indicated that respondents rated the video as excellent overall, with navigation receiving the highest scores, followed by assessment. Group comparisons showed that students gave consistently higher ratings than teachers. Despite differences in experience, the consistently high ratings from both groups suggest that the developed interactive video holds strong potential as an instructional material for teaching the plumbing system, addressing classroom engagement challenges, and contributing to the development of skills in the plumbing industry.
Downloads
References
Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), e05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
Adeoye, N. M. A., Wirawan, I. G. S., Pradnyani, N. M. S. S., & Septiarini, N. N. I. (2024). Revolutionizing education: Unleashing the power of the ADDIE model for effective teaching and learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 13(1), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68624
Amirova, A., Zhumabayeva, A., Zhunusbekova, A., Kalbergenova, S., Nygymanova, N., & Arenova, A. (2023). Effect of using Hyflex technology learning on preservice teachers’ success and attitudes. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(3), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3309
Artman, N. (2020). Applying the cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Using the ADDIE model to enhance instructional video. Explorations in Media Ecology, 19(3), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00054_1
Swisscontact. (2025, February 11). Digital learning materials for Cambodian TVET institutes. https://www.swisscontact.org/en/news/digital-learning-materials-for-cambodian-tvet-institutes
Dumadag, C. T., Silor, A. C., Capuno, G. G. D., & Cortez-David, S. (2023). Drop-out determinants that influence the out-of-school youth in Iligan City and Lanao Del Norte in the Philippines. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 6(4), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i4.1980
Ercikan, K., Guo, H., & He, Q. (2020). Use of response process data to inform group comparisons and fairness research. Educational Assessment, 25(3), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1804353
Faisal, S., Ivo, J., Tennant, R., Prior, K., Grindrod, K., McMillan, C., & Patel, T. (2022). Integration of a smart multidose blister package for medication intake: A mixed method ethnographic informed study of older adults with chronic diseases. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0262012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262012
Jacob, T., & Centofanti, S. (2023). Effectiveness of H5P in improving student learning outcomes in an online tertiary education setting. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(2), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09361-6
Jurs, P., & Špehte, E. (2021). The role of feedback in the distance learning process. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0019
Lase, D. (2019). Education and industrial revolution 4.0. Jurnal Handayani, 10(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.24114/jh.v10i1.14138
Lassoff, M. (2023, March 28). Research and goldfish: Best practices for determining video length. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/research-goldfish-best-practices-determining-video-length-lassoff/
Lewis, K., Demiroz, E., Chen, H., Albold, C., & Mahan, J. (2020). A four-pronged approach for evaluating e-learning modules with a newly developed instructional design scale. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education, 10(2), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20190307082154
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
McDermott, E. R., Donlan, A. E., & Zaff, J. F. (2018). Why do students drop out? Turning points and long-term experiences. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(2), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1517296
Mir, N. K., Iqbal, N. M. Z., & Shams, N. J. A. (2022). Investigation of students’ satisfaction about H5P interactive video on MOODLE for online learning. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 7(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.36261/ijdeel.v7i1.2228
Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., & Gupta, A. (2018). Scales of measurement and presentation of statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 21(4), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_131_18
Mohlabi-Tlaka, N., De Jager, L., & Engelbrecht, A. (2017). Policy, practice, purpose: The text-based approach in contemporary South African EFAL classrooms. Per Linguam, 33(2), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.5785/33-2-713
Mutawa, A. M., Muttawa, J. a. K. A., & Sruthi, S. (2023). The effectiveness of using H5P for undergraduate students in the asynchronous distance learning environment. Applied Sciences, 13(8), 4983. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084983
Nelms, A. A., & Segura-Totten, M. (2019). Expert–novice comparison reveals pedagogical implications for students’ analysis of primary literature. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar56. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-05-0077
Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Elsevier Science.
Qaddumi, H., Bartram, B., & Qashmar, A. L. (2020). Evaluating the impact of ICT on teaching and learning: A study of Palestinian students’ and teachers’ perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1865–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10339-5
Ramos, F. G. (2021). An evaluation of the technical vocational livelihood track in public senior high schools in the division of Batangas: Basis for an enhancement program. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 1103–1118. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i2/10269
Rara, M. Z., Liza, H. H., Asti, A. S. N. A., & Riri, R. R. F. (2024). Challenges and opportunities for using smartphones as learning media for students of Islamic education study program, State University of Jakarta. Journal of Social and Scientific Education, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.58230/josse.v1i1.30
Ravana, V., Wong, S. Y., Chua, K. H., & Palpanadan, S. T. (2023). Conceptualizing an integrated collaborative learning model for lower secondary science teaching-learning in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(2), 15–26.
Sánchez, T., León, J., Gilar-Corbi, R., & Castejón, J. (2021). Validation of a short scale for student evaluation of teaching ratings in a polytechnic higher education institution. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 682467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635543
Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
Wachtler, J., Hubmann, M., Zöhrer, H., & Ebner, M. (2016). An analysis of the use and effect of questions in interactive learning-videos. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0033-3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Charmine Chiu, Renefer Isidore B. Tito, Mariell Lumactod, Christopher Dumadag, Victor S. Rosales, Glay Vhincent C. Sumaylo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.