Development and Evaluation of Interactive Video: An Instructional Material for Teaching Plumbing System

Authors

  • Charmine Chiu Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology
  • Renefer Isidore B. Tito Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology
  • Mariell Lumactod Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology
  • Christopher Dumadag Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-6425
  • Victor S. Rosales Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology
  • Glay Vhincent C. Sumaylo Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58230/josse.v2i3.352

Keywords:

Interactive Video, Instructional Materials, Plumbing Systems, ADDIE Model, ICT Tools

Abstract

In the era of an ICT-driven educational landscape, engaging students in technical-vocational subjects remains a challenge, particularly in the plumbing trade, where there is a shortage of skilled practitioners and qualified trainers. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the acceptability of an interactive instructional video on the plumbing system to address both engagement and skill development needs. A developmental research method, guided by the ADDIE Model, was employed in designing videos, emphasizing content design, media design, visual design, assessment items, feedback mechanisms, and navigation. These features are intended to capture students’ interest, promote active engagement, and enhance appreciation of plumbing as both an academic subject and a viable trade. Purposive sampling was used to select 30 respondents: three (3) plumbing instructors, two (2) educational technology teachers, and twenty-five (25) third-year students majoring in Industrial Arts. The data were gathered using a modified survey questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed through descriptive statistics (frequency distribution, mean, standard deviation) and a Welch’s Independent T-test to compare teacher and student evaluations. Results indicated that respondents rated the video as excellent overall, with navigation receiving the highest scores, followed by assessment. Group comparisons showed that students gave consistently higher ratings than teachers. Despite differences in experience, the consistently high ratings from both groups suggest that the developed interactive video holds strong potential as an instructional material for teaching the plumbing system, addressing classroom engagement challenges, and contributing to the development of skills in the plumbing industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), e05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312

Adeoye, N. M. A., Wirawan, I. G. S., Pradnyani, N. M. S. S., & Septiarini, N. N. I. (2024). Revolutionizing education: Unleashing the power of the ADDIE model for effective teaching and learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 13(1), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68624

Amirova, A., Zhumabayeva, A., Zhunusbekova, A., Kalbergenova, S., Nygymanova, N., & Arenova, A. (2023). Effect of using Hyflex technology learning on preservice teachers’ success and attitudes. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(3), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3309

Artman, N. (2020). Applying the cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Using the ADDIE model to enhance instructional video. Explorations in Media Ecology, 19(3), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00054_1

Swisscontact. (2025, February 11). Digital learning materials for Cambodian TVET institutes. https://www.swisscontact.org/en/news/digital-learning-materials-for-cambodian-tvet-institutes

Dumadag, C. T., Silor, A. C., Capuno, G. G. D., & Cortez-David, S. (2023). Drop-out determinants that influence the out-of-school youth in Iligan City and Lanao Del Norte in the Philippines. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 6(4), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i4.1980

Ercikan, K., Guo, H., & He, Q. (2020). Use of response process data to inform group comparisons and fairness research. Educational Assessment, 25(3), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1804353

Faisal, S., Ivo, J., Tennant, R., Prior, K., Grindrod, K., McMillan, C., & Patel, T. (2022). Integration of a smart multidose blister package for medication intake: A mixed method ethnographic informed study of older adults with chronic diseases. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0262012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262012

Jacob, T., & Centofanti, S. (2023). Effectiveness of H5P in improving student learning outcomes in an online tertiary education setting. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(2), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09361-6

Jurs, P., & Špehte, E. (2021). The role of feedback in the distance learning process. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0019

Lase, D. (2019). Education and industrial revolution 4.0. Jurnal Handayani, 10(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.24114/jh.v10i1.14138

Lassoff, M. (2023, March 28). Research and goldfish: Best practices for determining video length. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/research-goldfish-best-practices-determining-video-length-lassoff/

Lewis, K., Demiroz, E., Chen, H., Albold, C., & Mahan, J. (2020). A four-pronged approach for evaluating e-learning modules with a newly developed instructional design scale. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education, 10(2), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20190307082154

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

McDermott, E. R., Donlan, A. E., & Zaff, J. F. (2018). Why do students drop out? Turning points and long-term experiences. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(2), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1517296

Mir, N. K., Iqbal, N. M. Z., & Shams, N. J. A. (2022). Investigation of students’ satisfaction about H5P interactive video on MOODLE for online learning. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 7(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.36261/ijdeel.v7i1.2228

Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., & Gupta, A. (2018). Scales of measurement and presentation of statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 21(4), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_131_18

Mohlabi-Tlaka, N., De Jager, L., & Engelbrecht, A. (2017). Policy, practice, purpose: The text-based approach in contemporary South African EFAL classrooms. Per Linguam, 33(2), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.5785/33-2-713

Mutawa, A. M., Muttawa, J. a. K. A., & Sruthi, S. (2023). The effectiveness of using H5P for undergraduate students in the asynchronous distance learning environment. Applied Sciences, 13(8), 4983. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084983

Nelms, A. A., & Segura-Totten, M. (2019). Expert–novice comparison reveals pedagogical implications for students’ analysis of primary literature. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar56. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-05-0077

Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Elsevier Science.

Qaddumi, H., Bartram, B., & Qashmar, A. L. (2020). Evaluating the impact of ICT on teaching and learning: A study of Palestinian students’ and teachers’ perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1865–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10339-5

Ramos, F. G. (2021). An evaluation of the technical vocational livelihood track in public senior high schools in the division of Batangas: Basis for an enhancement program. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 1103–1118. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i2/10269

Rara, M. Z., Liza, H. H., Asti, A. S. N. A., & Riri, R. R. F. (2024). Challenges and opportunities for using smartphones as learning media for students of Islamic education study program, State University of Jakarta. Journal of Social and Scientific Education, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.58230/josse.v1i1.30

Ravana, V., Wong, S. Y., Chua, K. H., & Palpanadan, S. T. (2023). Conceptualizing an integrated collaborative learning model for lower secondary science teaching-learning in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(2), 15–26.

Sánchez, T., León, J., Gilar-Corbi, R., & Castejón, J. (2021). Validation of a short scale for student evaluation of teaching ratings in a polytechnic higher education institution. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 682467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635543

Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7

Wachtler, J., Hubmann, M., Zöhrer, H., & Ebner, M. (2016). An analysis of the use and effect of questions in interactive learning-videos. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0033-3

Published

2025-09-08

How to Cite

Chiu, C., Tito, R. I. B., Lumactod, M., Dumadag, C., Rosales, V. S., & Sumaylo, G. V. C. (2025). Development and Evaluation of Interactive Video: An Instructional Material for Teaching Plumbing System. Journal of Social and Scientific Education, 2(3), 268-283. https://doi.org/10.58230/josse.v2i3.352

Similar Articles

11-20 of 37

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.