Peningkatan Akurasi Membaca Melalui Pembelajaran Fonik Eksplisit Berbantuan Komik Decodable pada Siswa dengan Kesulitan Membaca di Sekolah Dasar Inklusif

Authors

  • Eka Sofia Pertiwi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Siti Rohmah Nurhayati Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58230/ijier.v3i1.749

Keywords:

fonik eksplisit, komik decodable, akurasi membaca, kesulitan membaca, sekolah dasar inklusif

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mendeskripsikan penerapan pembelajaran fonik eksplisit berbantuan komik dekodabel pada siswa yang mengalami kesulitan membaca di sekolah dasar inklusif dan (2) menganalisis peningkatan akurasi membaca siswa setelah diberikan intervensi. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) berdasarkan model Kemmis dan McTaggart yang dilaksanakan dalam dua siklus pada semester genap tahun ajaran 2025/2026 di kelas V SDN 005 Rantau Pulung, Kabupaten Kutai Timur, Indonesia. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas dua siswa kelas V yang mengalami kesulitan membaca dan dipilih melalui teknik purposive sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes membaca nyaring (running record), observasi kelas, catatan lapangan, dan dokumentasi. Keabsahan penelitian diperkuat melalui validitas isi dan validitas ekologis. Data kuantitatif dianalisis secara deskriptif menggunakan persentase akurasi membaca, skor peningkatan (gain score), dan analisis noise, sedangkan data kualitatif dianalisis melalui reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran fonik eksplisit berbantuan komik dekodabel secara substansial meningkatkan akurasi membaca kedua subjek. Akurasi membaca siswa ARS meningkat dari 55% menjadi 100%, sedangkan siswa REN meningkat dari 35% menjadi 95%. Peningkatan tersebut disertai dengan berkurangnya kesalahan dekoding, meningkatnya partisipasi dan kepercayaan diri dalam membaca, serta perubahan strategi membaca dari menebak kata berdasarkan tampilan visual menjadi penggunaan strategi dekoding fonologis yang lebih sistematis. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran fonik eksplisit berbantuan komik dekodabel efektif sebagai intervensi untuk meningkatkan akurasi membaca siswa yang mengalami kesulitan membaca dalam konteks sekolah dasar inklusif.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262510769/beginning-to-read/

Arikunto, S., Suhardjono, & Supardi. (2022). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Bumi Aksara. https://www.bumiaksara.com/

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411

Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003393

Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. D. (2021). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (2021). Bringing data-based individualization to scale: A call for the next-generation technology of teacher supports. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(5), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420950654

Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2020). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/

Hadi, S., & Purwanti, D. (2021). Implementasi pembelajaran terdiferensiasi di sekolah dasar: Tantangan dan solusi. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(2), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.61132/pragmatik.v2i4.1056

International Dyslexia Association. (2020). Structured literacy: Effective instruction for students with dyslexia and related reading difficulties. https://dyslexiaida.org/structured-literacy-effective-instruction-for-students-with-dyslexia-and-related-reading-difficulties/

International Dyslexia Association. (2023). Knowledge and practice standards for teachers of reading. https://dyslexiaida.org/knowledge-and-practices/

Jap, B. A. J., Borleffs, E., & Maassen, B. A. M. (2017). Towards identifying dyslexia in Standard Indonesian: The development of a reading assessment battery. Reading and Writing, 30(8), 1729–1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9748-y

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2021). Merdeka belajar. https://merdekabelajar.kemdikbud.go.id/

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Panduan pelaksanaan pendidikan inklusif. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press.

Khotimah, H., & Hidayat, N. (2022). Interactive digital comic teaching materials to increase student engagement and learning outcomes. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v6i2.46038

Kim, Y.-S. G., Quinn, J. M., & Petscher, Y. (2021). What is text reading fluency and is it a predictor or an outcome of reading comprehension? A longitudinal investigation. Developmental Psychology, 57(5), 718–732. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001167

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678

Mertler, C. A. (2023). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (7th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/

Mesmer, H. A. E. (2020). Letter lessons and first words: Phonics foundations that work. Heinemann. https://www.heinemann.com/

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/findings

Nilvius, C., Carlsson, R., Fälth, L., & Nordström, T. (2021). Tier 2 interventions within the RtI-model for developing students’ word decoding – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1994105

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 70 Tahun 2009 tentang Pendidikan inklusif bagi peserta didik yang memiliki kelainan dan memiliki potensi kecerdasan dan/atau bakat istimewa. (2009). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/

Pugh, A., Kearns, D. M., & Hiebert, E. H. (2023). Text types and their relation to efficacy in beginning reading interventions. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(4), 710–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.513

Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2021). Annual research review: Reading disorders revisited—The critical importance of oral language. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(5), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13324

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. (2003). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/43920/uu-no-20-tahun-2003

Vaughn, S., Solis, M., Miciak, J., Fletcher, J. M., & Roberts, G. (2022). Providing reading interventions for students in grades 4–9 (WWC 2022009). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/29

Winskel, H., & Widjaja, V. (2007). Phonological awareness, letter knowledge, and literacy development in Indonesian beginner readers and spellers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070026

Xie, H., Peng, J., Qin, M., Huang, X., Tian, F., & Zhou, Z. (2018). Can touchscreen devices be used to facilitate young children's learning? A meta-analysis of touchscreen learning effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02580

Yuan, H., Kleemans, T., & Segers, E. (2024). The role of the traditional and digital home literacy environment in Chinese kindergartners' language and early literacy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 67, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.11.009

Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3

Verhallen, M. J. A. J., & Bus, A. G. (2011). Young second language learners' visual attention to illustrations in storybooks. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 11(4), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798411416785

Verhallen, M. J. A. J., & Bus, A. G. (2010). Low-income immigrant pupils learning vocabulary through digital picture storybooks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017133

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27