Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58230/ijier.v3i2.694Keywords:
kecerdasan buatan, model pembelajaran, keterampilan menulis, umpan balik otomatis, teknologi pendidikanAbstract
Menulis merupakan keterampilan berbahasa produktif yang menuntut proses kognitif kompleks, mulai dari perencanaan gagasan hingga penyuntingan akhir. Artikel ini mengkaji berbagai model pembelajaran berbasis kecerdasan buatan yang dikembangkan untuk meningkatkan keterampilan menulis peserta didik pada berbagai jenjang pendidikan. Kajian dilakukan melalui tinjauan pustaka naratif terhadap hasil penelitian empiris dan meta-analisis yang dipublikasikan pada rentang tahun 2019 hingga 2026. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan kecerdasan buatan, baik dalam bentuk sistem penilaian esai otomatis, asisten penulisan generatif, maupun model pembelajaran adaptif, memberikan pengaruh positif berukuran sedang terhadap peningkatan kualitas tulisan peserta didik. Keberhasilan penerapan tersebut sangat dipengaruhi oleh cara integrasi teknologi ke dalam desain pembelajaran, peran pendidik sebagai fasilitator, serta kesiapan literasi digital peserta didik. Kebaruan kajian ini terletak pada penyusunan kerangka model pembelajaran menulis berbasis kecerdasan buatan yang memadukan tiga pendekatan sekaligus, yaitu umpan balik otomatis, pendampingan generatif, dan pengawasan pedagogis manusia, sehingga berbeda dari kajian terdahulu yang cenderung membahas satu jenis teknologi secara terpisah. Simpulan kajian menekankan pentingnya kolaborasi antara teknologi dan peran guru agar kecerdasan buatan berfungsi sebagai mitra belajar, bukan pengganti proses berpikir peserta didik.
Downloads
References
Aljuaid, H. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence tools on academic writing instruction in higher education: A systematic review. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, 2024, 26–55. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.2
Ayoub, N. N., Joudi, N. S., Bou Saba, M. S., & Bou Saba, A. S. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence to enhance writing proficiency: An exploratory study of EFL students’ and instructors’ perspectives at a university level in Lebanon. European Scientific Journal, 21(14), 37. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2025.v21n14p37
Baadilla. (2025). Efektivitas artificial intelligence berbasis deep learning dalam meningkatkan keterampilan menulis. Sawerigading.
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: Effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 584–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071
Bašić, Ž., Banovac, A., Kružić, I., & Jerković, I. (2023). ChatGPT-3.5 as writing assistance in students’ essays. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 750. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02269-7
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. Dalam A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (hlm. 39–64). Cambridge University Press.
Chen, C., & Gong, Y. (2025). The role of AI-assisted learning in academic writing: A mixed-methods study on Chinese as a second language students. Education Sciences, 15(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020141
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6187–6203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861
Darmawansah, D., Rachman, D., Febiyani, F., & Hwang, G.-J. (2025). ChatGPT-supported collaborative argumentation: Integrating collaboration script and argument mapping to enhance EFL students’ argumentation skills. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 3803–3827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12986-4
ElMassry, A. M., Zaki, N., AlSheikh, N., & Mediani, M. (2025). A systematic review of pretrained models in automated essay scoring. IEEE Access.
Faseeh, M., Jaleel, A., Iqbal, N., Ghani, A., Abdusalomov, A., Mehmood, A., & Cho, Y.-I. (2024). Hybrid approach to automated essay scoring: Integrating deep learning embeddings with handcrafted linguistic features for improved accuracy. Mathematics, 12(21), 3416.
Fleckenstein, J., Liebenow, L. W., & Meyer, J. (2023). Automated feedback and writing: A multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students’ performance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1162454. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1162454
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition & Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115885
Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Han, J., Yoo, H., Myung, J., Kim, M., Lee, T. Y., Ahn, S.-Y., & Oh, A. (2024). RECIPE4U: Student-ChatGPT interaction dataset in EFL writing education. Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation, 13666–13676.
Huang, X., Xu, W., Li, F., & Yu, Z. (2024). A meta-analysis of effects of automated writing evaluation on anxiety, motivation, and second language writing skills. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00865-y
Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
Khan, A., & Ghani, M. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence writing tools on the academic writing skills of ESL learners: A study conducted at graduate level in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social, Education and Language, 10, 228–233.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Technical Report EBSE 2007-001). Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.
Koltovskaia, S., Rahmati, P., & Saeli, H. (2024). Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement. Journal of Second Language Writing, 65, 101130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101130
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., & Darwis, A. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: Higher education student’s perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
Mansoor, H. S., Sumardjoko, B., & Sutopo, A. (2026). External variables influencing the attitudes of students toward AI acceptance in improving English writing: A systematic review. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1719955
Marghany, M. M. (2023). Using artificial intelligence-based instruction to develop EFL higher education students’ essay writing skills. CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Education, 82(1), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.21608/opde.2023.313623
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
Ngo, T. T. N., Chen, H. H. J., & Lai, K. K. W. (2024). The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation in EFL/ESL writing: A three-level meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2), 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2096642
Oruç, T., Aktaş, İ., & Kurt, M. (2026). The effects of artificial intelligence-assisted creative writing on students’ writing motivation, writing anxiety, and creative writing skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251409998
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Shi, H., & Aryadoust, V. (2024). A systematic review of AI-based automated written feedback research. ReCALL, 36(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000265
Suranti, M. Y. (2025). Peningkatan keterampilan penulisan artikel ilmiah berbantuan artificial intelligence. Indonesian Journal of Education and Community Service, 4(1), 17–23.
Wahdini, L. (2026). Integrasi artificial intelligence (AI) sebagai media pembelajaran menulis ilmiah: Analisis persepsi dan hasil pembelajaran mahasiswa. ESTETIK: Jurnal Bahasa Indonesia.
Wu, J., Chen, Q., Jiang, H., & Bai, X. (2026). The effect of artificial intelligence on students’ writing performance: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-026-10884-4
Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2022). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: A systematic investigation of college students’ acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2817–2842. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019
Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2023). The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation on writing quality: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(4), 875–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221127300
Zheng, L., Niu, J., Zhong, L., & Gyasi, J. F. (2023). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5650–5664. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2015693
