Kepemimpinan Berkeadilan Gender dalam Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam: Kajian Literatur Kritis Perspektif Qirā’ah Mubādalah dan Implikasinya bagi Tata Kelola Akademik

Gender-Equitable Leadership in Islamic Higher Education Management: A Critical Literature Review Based on the Qirā’ah Mubādalah Perspective and Its Implications for Academic Governance

Authors

  • Zakiya Sifa Amri Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Zainal Arifin Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Karwadi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Rohmatun Lukluk Isnaini Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Fira Nisa Rahmawati Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Siti Nisrofah Institut Teknologi dan Sains Nahdlatul Ulama Pekalongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58230/z1wm0b57

Keywords:

Kepemimpinan akademik, Negosiasi gender, Perguruan tinggi keagamaan Islam, Qirā’ah Mubādalah, Kajian literatur kritis

Abstract

Ketimpangan gender dalam kepemimpinan perguruan tinggi keagamaan Islam tidak dapat dijelaskan hanya dari sedikitnya perempuan yang menduduki jabatan formal. Prosedur organisasi, legitimasi simbolik, dan penafsiran keagamaan bersama-sama memengaruhi akses terhadap kewenangan serta negosiasi kepemimpinan sehari-hari. Artikel ini menyusun kajian literatur kritis-integratif mengenai negosiasi peran gender di perguruan tinggi keagamaan Islam Indonesia melalui perspektif Qirā’ah Mubādalah. Literatur dipilih secara purposif dari teori dasar organisasi, artikel internasional telaah sejawat mengenai kepemimpinan akademik, penelitian empiris kelembagaan Islam Indonesia, dan kajian hermeneutika kesalingan. Sumber dibandingkan berdasarkan konteks, rancangan, temuan, serta keteralihan hasil. Sintesis mengidentifikasi empat mekanisme yang berhubungan, yakni struktur kesempatan yang bias gender, negosiasi legitimasi profesional dan sosial-keagamaan, penalaran etis kesalingan, serta akuntabilitas kelembagaan. Bukti PTKI memperlihatkan bahwa hambatan representasi hadir bersamaan dengan agensi strategis pemimpin perempuan, sedangkan literatur mubādalah terutama menyediakan kerangka normatif, bukan pengukuran dampak tata kelola. Artikel ini menawarkan model konseptual empat ranah dan indikator untuk penelitian empiris berikutnya. Kontribusinya ialah integrasi analitis perspektif organisasi, sosial-keagamaan, dan kesalingan tanpa menyamakan proposisi konseptual dengan dampak kebijakan yang telah terbukti.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, Z., Ghani, M. F. A., Pabbajah, M., & Fatmawati, E. (2023). Why does women’s underrepresentation transpire in the leadership of Indonesian State Islamic Universities? Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(3), 878–892. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v7i3.5914

Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002

Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499

Aiston, S. J., & Fo, C. K. (2021). The silence/ing of academic women. Gender and Education, 33(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1716955

Aliyah, S. A., & Aulia, R. S. (2022). Metode Qira’ah Mubadalah pada kasus kepemimpinan perempuan. An-Nida’, 46(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.24014/an-nida.v46i2.20860

Asri, Z. Y., & Abror, I. (2021). Hadith of women leadership in the Qira’ah Mubadalah approach. Jurnal Living Hadis, 6(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.14421/livinghadis.2021.2900

Barlas, A. (2002). “Believing women” in Islam: Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qur’an. University of Texas Press.

Benschop, Y., & Brouns, M. (2003). Crumbling ivory towers: Academic organizing and its gender effects. Gender, Work & Organization, 10(2), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.t01-1-00011

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386

Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Advancing gender equity in organizations: The challenge and importance of maintaining a gender narrative. Organization, 7(4), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840074005

Fauzi, M. A., Tan, C. N.-L., Muhamad Tamyez, P. F., Abd Aziz, N. A., & Wider, W. (2024). Women leadership in higher education: Past, present and future trends. Asian Education and Development Studies, 13(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-11-2023-0168

Gaus, N., Larada, N., Jamaluddin, S., Paramma, M. A., & Karim, A. (2023). Understanding the emergence of females as leaders in academia: The intersections of gender stereotypes, status and emotion. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(4), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12426

Gilbert, E., O’Shea, M., Duffy, S., & Taylor, C. (2024). Playing the game differently: How women leaders in academia are challenging neopatriarchy. Sex Roles, 90(12), 1735–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01544-4

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Hidayah, S. N., Abdalla, M., Faris, N., & Kutieleh, S. (2025). Redefining leadership frames: Understanding the frames of female leaders in Indonesian Islamic higher education institutions. Ulumuna, 29(2), 1039–1070. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v29i2.1518

Hidayah, S. N., & Munastiwi, E. (2019). Pemimpin akademik atau manajerial? Aspirasi, harapan dan tantangan perempuan untuk menjadi pemimpin di lembaga pendidikan tinggi Islam. PALASTREN Jurnal Studi Gender, 12(2), 455–486. https://doi.org/10.21043/palastren.v12i2.5628

Isnaini, R., Hanum, F., & Prasojo, L. (2021). Quality management development through gender equality based leadership in Nahdlatul Ulama Universities. The Qualitative Report, 26(11). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4877

Isnaini, R. L. (2021). Women’s leadership in quality management development and gender equality within the context of Nahdlatul Ulama Universities in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2021.101.23-47

Isnaini, R. L., Arifin, Z., Rahmi, S., & Syafii, A. (2023). Gender-based leadership in quality assurance development: A phenomenological study. Cogent Education, 10(2), Article 2255078. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2255078

Kaymakcioglu, A. G., & Thomas, M. (2024). Gender inequalities and academic leadership in Nigeria, South Africa and the United Kingdom: A systematic literature review (2013–2023). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, Article 101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101066

Koburtay, T., & Abuhussein, T. (2021). Normative Islam, prejudice and women leaders: Why do Arab women leaders suffer? Journal of Gender Studies, 30(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1863195

Koburtay, T., Abuhussein, T., & Sidani, Y. M. (2023). Women leadership, culture, and Islam: Female voices from Jordan. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(2), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05041-0

Kodir, F. A. (2019). Qirā’ah Mubādalah: Tafsir progresif untuk keadilan gender dalam Islam (1st ed.). IRCiSoD.

Latifi, Y. N., & Triantini, Z. E. (2024). Meretas jalan kesetaraan: Praktik baik dan refleksi program sekolah gender di Perguruan Tinggi. Musãwa: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam, 23(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2024.232.253-270

Meza-Mejia, M. D. C., Villarreal-García, M. A., & Ortega-Barba, C. F. (2023). Women and leadership in Higher Education: A systematic review. Social Sciences, 12(10), Article 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100555

Morley, L. (2013). The rules of the game: Women and the leaderist turn in higher education. Gender and Education, 25(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2012.740888

Mulya, T. W., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2021). ‘Leadership is a sacred matter’: Women leaders contesting and contextualising neoliberal meritocracy in the Indonesian academia. Gender and Education, 33(7), 930–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1802407

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

Van Den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411414293

Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and woman: Rereading the sacred text from a woman’s perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002

Witriani, Triantini, Z. E., Amran, N. N., & Wijayati, M. (2026). Navigating gender mainstreaming and politics of candidacy: Women’s leadership in Indonesian Islamic higher education (2012–2022). Musãwa: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam, 25(1), 44–60. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/pusat/MUSAWA/article/view/4963

Xiao, Y., Pinkney, E., Li, T., & Yip, P. S. F. (2023). Breaking through the glass ceiling: Unveiling women’s representation by gender and race in the higher education hierarchy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), Article 975. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02481-5

Downloads

Published

2026-11-11