Perilaku Menolong dan Batas Etis Bantuan Akademik pada Mahasiswa Berlatar Belakang Pesantren di IAI Faqih Asy’ari Kediri
Helping Behavior and Ethical Limits of Academic Assistance among Students with a Pesantren Background at IAI Faqih Asy’ari Kediri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58230/pv1ar918Keywords:
ta'awun, integritas akademik, mahasiswa santri, perguruan tinggi Islam, perilaku menolongAbstract
Nilai ta’awun mendorong individu untuk saling membantu dalam kebaikan, tetapi dalam kehidupan akademik tolong-menolong dapat menimbulkan dilema ketika bantuan melampaui batas integritas akademik. Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan bentuk perilaku menolong, alasan yang melatarbelakanginya, dan pemahaman mengenai batas etisnya pada mahasiswa berlatar belakang pesantren di Institut Agama Islam Faqih Asy’ari Kediri. Penelitian menggunakan desain kualitatif deskriptif. Data berasal dari survei angket terbuka tanpa nama kepada 20 mahasiswa semester 1, observasi kelas, dan telaah dokumen perkuliahan. Data dianalisis dengan model Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña, dan kredibilitasnya diperiksa melalui triangulasi sumber data. Temuan dibaca melalui kerangka perilaku menolong Myers dan Twenge. Delapan belas dari 20 mahasiswa pernah membantu atau dibantu temannya, terutama dengan mendampingi, merevisi, dan meringkas makalah menjelang presentasi. Alasan yang dikemukakan adalah budaya pesantren, keterbatasan pengetahuan tentang tugas kuliah, solidaritas dan rasa iba, serta harapan dibantu kembali. Seluruh 18 responden yang menjawab pertanyaan skenario menolak perjokian dan menilai bantuan melewati batas bila pihak yang dibantu tidak berkontribusi, tetapi seluruhnya juga menganggap berbagi file tugas sebagai contoh boleh, yang menunjukkan wilayah abu-abu. Temuan ini berupa penilaian yang dinyatakan, bukan perilaku yang diamati, dan dapat dipengaruhi desirabilitas sosial. Sampel yang kecil dari satu program studi dan peran ganda peneliti sebagai dosen membatasi generalisasi. Penelitian ini menawarkan kriteria praktis untuk berbagi file tugas di perguruan tinggi Islam.
Downloads
References
Al-Qurṭubī, Abū ‘Abd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. (1987). Al-Jāmi‘ li aḥkām al-Qur’ān (Vol. 6). Hai’ah Al-Misriyyah Al-‘Ammah Lil Kitab.
Al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. (2001). Jāmi‘ al-bayān ‘an ta’wīl āy al-Qur’ān. Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Amalia, N. P. N., & Rohman, M. F. (2023). Tinjauan hukum Islam terhadap usaha jasa penurunan persentase Turnitin pada karya tulis ilmiah mahasiswa. Al-Iqtishod: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 5(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.51339/iqtis.v5i2.1319
Ann Cutler, N., Halcomb, E., & Sim, J. (2021). Using naturalistic inquiry to inform qualitative description. Nurse Researcher, 29(3), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2021.e1788
Awdry, R. (2021). Assignment outsourcing: Moving beyond contract cheating. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1765311
Awdry, R., & Ives, B. (2021). Students cheat more often from those known to them: Situation matters more than the individual. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8), 1254–1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1851651
Curtis, G. J., Clare, J., Vieira, E., Selby, E., & Jonason, P. K. (2022). Predicting contract cheating intentions: Dark personality traits, attitudes, norms, and anticipated guilt and shame. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, Article 111277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111277
Darsih, & Suralaga, F. (2024). Faktor khauf: Bagaimana peran khauf dalam memoderasi sikap pada kecurangan terhadap integritas akademik. Psikis: Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 10(2), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.19109/psikis.v10i2.23732
Fadhlah, R., & Fahmi, K. (2025). Perilaku sosial santriwati di Pondok Pesantren As-salam Naga Beralih. Jurnal Perspektif, 8(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.24036/perspektif.v8i3.1084
Garvey, C. M., & Jones, R. (2021). Is there a place for theoretical frameworks in qualitative research? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, Article 1609406920987959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920987959
Habiburrahim, H., Trisnawati, I. K., Yuniarti, Y., Zainuddin, Z., Muluk, S., & Orrell, J. (2021). Scrutinizing cheating behavior among EFL students at Islamic higher education institutions in Indonesia. The Qualitative Report, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4683
Harper, R., & Prentice, F. (2024). ‘We’ share but ‘They’ cheat: Student qualitative perspectives on cheating in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00171-6
Harrison, D., Patch, A., McNally, D., & Harris, L. (2021). Student and faculty perceptions of study helper websites: A new practice in collaborative cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09373-2
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Herdian, H., & Mildaeni, I. N. (2022). Academic dishonesty based on religiosity among Muslim students in Indonesia. Cultura Educación y Sociedad, 13(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.17981/cultedusoc.13.1.2022.01
Ibn Kathīr, Ismā‘īl ibn ‘Umar. (1999). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘aẓīm. Dār Ṭayyibah.
International Center for Academic Integrity. (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd ed.). https://www.academicintegrity.org/fundamental
InfoPublik. (2025). SPI Pendidikan 2024: Menyontek dan plagiarisme masih marak di sekolah dan kampus. https://infopublik.id/kategori/nasional-politik-hukum/916454/spi-pendidikan-2024-menyontek-dan-plagiarisme-masih-marak-di-sekolah-dan-kampus
Jamaluddin, S. F., & Lufityanto, G. (2021). The paradox of integrity: Cheating awareness among religious high school student in Yogyakarta [Paradoks integritas: Kesadaran akan perilaku kecurangan di kalangan siswa sekolah menengah atas berbasis agama di Yogyakarta]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v36i1.2500
Jamaluddin, S. F., Lufityanto, G., Purba, F. D., Lesmana, C. B. J., Andrianto, S., Ardi, R., Siswadi, A. G. P., Ridfah, A., Kristanto, A. A., Hutapea, B., Suryani, L. K., Wisayanti, S., Achmad, R. A., Zwagery, R. V., Fernandez, E. F., Ismail, R., Ishak, M. S., Zhi, A. C. H., Hashim, I. H. M., … Chobthamkit, P. (2024). Spirituality beyond religiosity: Understanding perceptions of academic cheating in Indonesia and Malaysia. Jurnal Psikologi, 51(3), 231. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.99452
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (t.t.). Al-Qur’an dan terjemahannya. https://quran.kemenag.go.id/
Kenia, D., & Uyun, M. (2023). Islamic religiosity and perceived behavioral control on academic cheating. International Journal of Islamic Educational Psychology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/ijiep.v4i1.17743
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2025). Temuan hasil SPI Pendidikan 2024: Menyontek dan plagiarisme masih merebak di sekolah dan kampus. https://kpk.go.id/id/ruang-informasi/berita/temuan-hasil-spi-pendidikan-2024-menyontek-dan-plagiarisme-masih-merebak-di-sekolah-dan-kampus
Lestari, W. I., Latifa, R., & Rahmah, M. (2022). Academic cheating in pesantren: How self efficacy, religiosity, and academic integrity predict academic cheating. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v9i1.24701
Mejía, A., & Garcés-Flórez, M. F. (2025). What do we mean by academic integrity? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 21(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00176-1
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Myers, D. G., & Twenge, J. M. (2019). Social psychology (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Na’imah, T., Azzahra, N. F., Septyningtyas, D. J., M Suud, F., & Tahir, K. R. (2025). The meaning of ta’awun in boarding school life: An interpretative phenomenological perspective. Psikis: Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 11(2), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.19109/psikis.v11i2.29810
Oktaviyani, D., Sunawan, S., & Khairkhah, K. (2022). The prediction of religiosity on students’ academic dishonesty. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 19(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2022.191-07
Parkinson, A. L., Hatje, E., Kynn, M., Kuballa, A. V., Donkin, R., & Reinke, N. B. (2022). Collusion is still a tricky topic: Student perspectives of academic integrity using assessment-specific examples in a science subject. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1416–1428. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2040947
Piliavin, J. A., & Charng, H.-W. (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 27–65. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000331
Salabi, A. (2025). The role of Islamic boarding school culture in forming discipline and collective cooperation in Darul Hijrah Islamic boarding school. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 7(1), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v7i1.2468
Sandelowski, M. (2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362
Shofiyyah, & Suryani, S. (2026). Forgiveness dengan altruisme pada santri pondok pesantren. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif, 13(2), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.v13i2.3436
Uyun, M. (2020). Islamic religiosity toward academic fraud student of UIN Raden Fatah Palembang. Psikis: Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 6(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.19109/psikis.v6i1.4730
Villamin, P., Lopez, V., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2025). A worked example of qualitative descriptive design: A step-by-step guide for novice and early career researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(8), 5181–5195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16481
