Modal Sosial Lintas Agama pada Organisasi Kerohanian Mahasiswa: Studi Kasus Kualitatif dan Kerangka Konseptual Tiga Ranah di Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Cross-Faith Social Capital in Religious Student Organizations: A Qualitative Case Study and a Three-Domain Conceptual Framework at Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Authors

  • Fernanda Amny Syaputra Universitas Sam Ratulangi
  • Suhendra Abd Kader Universitas Sam Ratulangi
  • Lulu Qurrata A’yun Universitas Sam Ratulangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58230/a6p12n45

Keywords:

Modal Sosial, Linking Social Capital, Bridging Social Capital, Toleransi Beragama, Organisasi Kerohanian Mahasiswa

Abstract

Organisasi kerohanian mahasiswa di kampus yang majemuk secara agama kerap diharapkan memperkuat solidaritas internal, tetapi apakah ikatan itu juga membuka relasi lintas agama masih merupakan pertanyaan empiris. Studi kasus kualitatif di Universitas Sam Ratulangi (UNSRAT), Manado, bertujuan mengidentifikasi praktik toleransi pengurus organisasi kerohanian Islam, Kristen, dan Katolik; menganalisis bekerjanya kepercayaan, jaringan, resiprositas, dan norma dalam modal sosial mengikat (bonding), menjembatani (bridging), dan vertikal (linking); mengidentifikasi faktor pendukung dan penghambat; serta merumuskan kerangka konseptual penguatan modal sosial lintas agama. Data dikumpulkan pada Juli–September 2026 melalui wawancara semiterstruktur dengan 24 informan (20 mahasiswa dari 11 fakultas, tiga Wakil Dekan Bidang Kemahasiswaan, dan satu dosen Agama Islam), observasi, dan telaah program kerja. Berlandaskan teori Putnam, Szreter dan Woolcock, teori fokus Feld, serta teori kontak antarkelompok, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa bonding dan bridging berjalan berdampingan: ikatan internal dibangun melalui program masing-masing organisasi, sedangkan relasi lintas agama terbentuk terutama dalam kepanitiaan fakultas, bakti sosial, dan rapat organisasi kemahasiswaan. Bridging masih episodik dan ditopang oleh kepercayaan dari kerja sama berulang, resiprositas sehari-hari, serta norma menahan diri dan klarifikasi. Unsur kelembagaan menyediakan perlakuan setara, fasilitas, dan insentif, tetapi forum antarorganisasi yang permanen belum ada. Hambatan utamanya jadwal padat, ruang pertemuan rutin yang terbatas, dan provokasi di media sosial. Kerangka Konseptual Tiga Ranah masih berupa rekomendasi konseptual yang belum divalidasi karena data berasal dari satu kampus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5

Ainah, N., Zulkifli, M., & Iderus, M. H. S. (2025). Dinamika interaksi sosial lintas agama: Persepsi dan perilaku toleransi beragama di perguruan tinggi. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 3(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.63243/msp9jt20

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.

Aquilera, C., Aldaffa, D., Izzaty, B. S., Dewanto, N., Raditya, M. T., & Pastikha, R. D. (2026). The role of religious moderation values in shaping student tolerance attitudes within campus environments. Jurnal Indonesia Studi Moderasi Beragama, 3(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.64420/jismb.v3i2.602

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Erices-Ocampo, P., Lubbers, M. J., & adams, j. (2025). Toward a unified conceptualization of social capital. Annual Review of Sociology, 51(1), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090924-032037

Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035. https://doi.org/10.1086/227352

Hadiyanto, A., Anggraeni, D., Rusyd, I., & Irfan, M. (2026). Strengthening religious moderation to counter the spread of transnational ideologies: A case study of religious activities in Indonesian universities. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 37(2), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v37i2.7289

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Kholisah, N., Dewi, D. A., & Furnamasari, Y. F. (2021). Meningkatkan sikap toleransi antar sesama masyarakat di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 9021–9025. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/2415

Kusmayani, A. E. P. (2023). Youth interfaith dialogue in everyday citizenship in Indonesia: Bridging religious diversity and citizenship challenges. FOCUS, 4(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.26593/focus.v4i2.7375

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Lowe, M. (2021). Types of contact: A field experiment on collaborative and adversarial caste integration. American Economic Review, 111(6), 1807–1844. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191780

Lubis, A. F., Busahdiar, B., Lubis, S. H., Muthohirin, N., Sulthani, D. A., & Syahputra, H. I. (2025). Bonding, bridging, and linking social capital in the construction of religious moderation: A case study of an Indonesian Islamic university. Progresiva: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam, 14(02), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.22219/progresiva.v14i02.42540

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

Motulsky, S. L. (2021). Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research?. Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000215

Muslimin, A. A. (2026). Religious moderation, digital literacy in social cohesion interaction among the university students in Indonesia. Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science, 3(2), 40–66. https://doi.org/10.59543/jidmis.v3.1322

Mustafida, F., Sulistiani, I. R., Mohammad Hakim, D., Aliffiati, & Fatinatul Fitroh, S. (2026). Social and cultural capital in multicultural campuses: Effects on tolerance among multiethnic students. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.32674/35frf746

Nashori, F., Nurjannah, N., Diana, R. R., Faraz, F., Khairunnisa, N. Z., & Muwaga, M. (2024). Inter-religious social prejudice among Indonesian Muslim students. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 23(1), 241–274. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol23.iss1.art8

Paluck, E. L., Porat, R., Clark, C. S., & Green, D. P. (2021). Prejudice reduction: Progress and challenges. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 533–560. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619

Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

Priyatna, S. E., Fidzi, R., Sabda, S., & Yaqin, H. (2025). Religious moderation as the pillar of Islamic education: A cross-disciplinary approach for the global era. Al-I’lam: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 8(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.31764/jail.v8i2.30323

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x

Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820740

Rois, N., Rahmawati, L., Mahsun, & Fadhillah, I. (2025). Youth as frontline peacebuilders: Integrating intergroup contact and social capital to prevent religious conflict in Central Java. Harmoni, 24(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v24i2.887

Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 12(1), 22–29. https://repository.uindatokarama.ac.id/id/eprint/1247

SETARA Institute (2017). Manado kota paling toleran 2017. https://setara-institute.org/media_setara/manado-kota-paling-toleran-2017/

SETARA Institute (2018). Indeks Kota Toleran (IKT) tahun 2018. https://setara-institute.org/indeks-kota-toleran-ikt-tahun-2018/

Szreter, S. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33(4), 650–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh013

Taquette, S. R., & Borges da Matta Souza, L. M. (2022). Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research: A critical literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221078731. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221078731

Tondok, M. S., Suryanto, S., & Ardi, R. (2022). Intervention program to reduce religious prejudice in education settings: A scoping review. Religions, 13(4), 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040299

Tungkagi, D., & Adlin Sila, M. (2022). Baku tolong, Torang Samua Basudara: Modal sosial dan titik temu dalam mengelola keragaman etnoreligius di wilayah transmigrasi Dumoga, Sulawesi Utara. Harmoni, 21(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v21i1.608

Universitas Sam Ratulangi (2026). Dashboard akademik: Mahasiswa aktif per program studi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. https://dashboard.unsrat.ac.id/Akademik/mahasiswaAktifIPKProdi/8

Verkuyten, M., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2017). The social psychology of intergroup toleration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316640974

Vivek, R., Nanthagopan, Y., & Piriyatharshan, S. (2023). Beyond methods: Theoretical underpinnings of triangulation in qualitative and multi-method studies. SEEU Review, 18(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2023-0088

Widianto, A. A., Meiji, N. H. P., Habibi, M. M., Alam, M., Ramadhan, A. G., & Dini, A. M. (2023). Revitalizing local wisdom: The governance of religious diversity in Manado. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2023 (IJCAH 2023) (Vol. 785, pp. 1746–1757). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-152-4_176

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-11